Vascular education through e-Learning.

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has changed everyday life and work in many ways. As travelling to meetings and conferences was almost completely suppressed for most of healthcare professionals, e-Learning became increasingly prominent. The overall utility of e-Learning during the COVID-19 pandemic as well as its shortcomings in the international community of vascular surgery were assessed through the EL-COVID study. Regional variability was observed amongst participating nations, which is currently being addressed through several ongoing subgroup analyses. Our study completes the aforementioned efforts and aims to investigate the adherence and adoption of vascular e-Learning in Germany. Methods and participants: Using an online survey, EL-COVID gathered answers from 856 vascular surgeons, of whom 70 were located in Germany. We analyzed the answers of 62 German responders that attended at least one e-Learning activity and compared them with the remaining worldwide data. Results: Out of all European countries, Germany was best represented and ranked second worldwide after Mainland China (n=109). 30.6 percent of the German responders were female (vs. 20% worldwide; p=0.048) and 56.4% were vascular surgeons with >5 years of practice (vs. 56.3; p=0.975). The international cohort generally engaged in more e-Learning. Most German participants attended less than 4 online activities, while only 24.2% took part in more than 4 such events (vs. 56.3; p<0.0001). While the overall impression of e-Learning activities during the COVID-19 pandemic was positive, German employers were less supportive of participation during working hours (30.6% vs. 44%; p=0.042). The main reason for not attending was lack of time due to increased workload (56.5% vs. 50%; p=0.328). National and international societies played a lesser role in promoting such activities in Germany (22.6% vs. 39.2%; p=0.010), the same accounts for social media (16.1 vs. 30.3; p=0.017). Conclusions: E-Learning complements the classical training methods and has been embraced as a relevant alternative in the time of the COVID-19 pandemic. The results of this survey appeal to German employers and national societies to improve support and dissemination of e-Learning activities in the vascular medicine community.

Dataset of the vascular e-Learning during the COVID-19 pandemic (EL-COVID) survey.

This dataset supports the findings of the vascular e-Learning during the COVID-19 pandemic survey (the EL-COVID survey). The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) of the European Union was taken into consideration in all steps of data handling. The survey was approved by the institutional ethics committee of the Primary Investigator and an online English survey consisting of 18 questions was developed ad-hoc. A bilingual English-Mandarin version of the questionnaire was developed according to the instructions of the Chinese Medical Association in order to be used in mainland People's Republic of China. Differences between the two questionnaires were minor and did affect the process of data collection. Both questionnaires were hosted online. The EL-COVID survey was advertised through major social media. All national and regional contributors contacted their respective colleagues through direct messaging on social media or by email. Eight national societies or groups supported the dissemination of the EL-COVID survey. The data provided demographics information of the EL-COVID participants and an insight on the level of difficulty in accessing or citing previously attended online activities and whether participants were keen on citing these activities in their Curricula Vitae. A categorization of additional comments made by the participants are also based on the data. The survey responses were filtered, anonymized and submitted to descriptive analysis of percentage.

Vascular e-Learning During the COVID-19 Pandemic: The EL-COVID Survey.

BACKGROUND: The corona virus disease (COVID-19) pandemic has radically changed the possibilities for vascular surgeons and trainees to exchange knowledge and experience. The aim of the present survey is to inventorize the e-learning needs of vascular surgeons and trainees as well as the strengths and weaknesses of vascular e-Learning. METHODS: An online survey consisting of 18 questions was created in English, with a separate bilingual English-Mandarin version. The survey was dispersed to vascular surgeons and trainees worldwide through social media and via direct messaging from June 15, 2020 to October 15, 2020. RESULTS: Eight hundred and fifty-six records from 84 different countries could be included. Most participants attended several online activities (>4: n = 461, 54%; 2-4: n = 300, 35%; 1: n = 95, 11%) and evaluated online activities as positive or very positive (84.7%). In deciding upon participation, the topic of the activity was most important (n = 440, 51.4%), followed by the reputation of the presenter or the panel (n = 178, 20.8%), but not necessarily receiving accreditation or certification (n = 52, 6.1%). The survey identified several shortcomings in vascular e-Learning during the pandemic: limited possibility to attend due to lack of time and increased workload (n = 432, 50.5%), no protected/allocated time (n = 488, 57%) and no accreditation or certification, while technical shortcomings were only a minor problem (n = 25, 2.9%). CONCLUSIONS: During the COVID-19 pandemic vascular e-Learning has been used frequently and was appreciated by vascular professionals from around the globe. The survey identified strengths and weaknesses in current e-Learning that can be used to further improve online learning in vascular surgery.